Which is Better: TPA3116 and TPA3255? A Side-by-Side Look

Sick and tired of mediocre sound quality from your audio system?  Here comes the TPA3116, TPA3255, and TPA3255 amplifier chips-two most potent among the audio cartridges. But which of them is in more remarkable ascendancy? 

Overview of TPA3116 and TPA3255

Key features of TPA3116

TPA3116, a Class D audio amplifier chip offering high performance within a better compact design with an efficiency rate, goes with the least total harmonic distortion and gives its output power of 50W per channel, which itself proves its worth. It's worth its salt in providing the lowest THD+N and good SNR with more precise sound reproduction. Equally commendable is its built-in thermal protection and short-circuit protection, making it much more reliable and longer-living.

Main characteristics of TPA3255

On the other hand, TPA3255 is a bigger Class D amplifier chip having 100-power output immortalized in it from its twin. Many of the chief characteristics between the TPA3255 and TPA3116 are efficiency and quality of audio; however, much power output is offered by it through the capability to meet the requirements of demand. Advanced features such as over-current protection and clip detection would help defend audio integrity even under higher volume settings are also provided by the TPA3255.

Target applications for both chips

Both TPA3116 and TPA3255, and TPA3255 are well-suited for almost every possible audio application. The TPA3116 is better as a mid-power for bookshelf speakers, small built-in home theater systems, and desktop setups. It has a compact size, and its efficiency, coupled with its small size, makes it a popular choice for portable audio devices. As for the TPA3255, its output makes it appropriate for the larger hot rods that drive prominent speakers and larger home theater setups that require it to fill vast spaces in sound.

TPA3116 and TPA3255 Power Output Comparison

Maximum power output

Maximum power output: The amplifier chips TPA3116, TPA3255, and TPA3255 differ significantly regarding their maximum power output. The TPA3116 delivers up to 50W per channel under stereo configuration. The TPA3255, on the contrary, can drive output powers of around 300W/channel. That substantial difference makes the TPA3255 more applicable for various high-power applications, such as professional audio systems or large venue installations.

Efficiency ratings

Efficiency ratings: Both chips enjoy very high-efficiency ratings, but TPA3255 is a notch above the competition. It operates at an efficiency rating of about 90%, acceptable for most applications. TPA3255 goes slightly higher, boasting efficiency ratings of up to 92-93%, delivering less wasted energy as heat and keeping it cooler to the touch.

Heat dissipation

Because of its better electricity conduction rate, TPA3255 usually generates less heat in specific power ranges when compared to TPA3116. Less heat produced allows compact designs and more considerable lifecycle potential of an amplifier. No matter how much heat dissipation happens, one day, TPA3255 could get along using heavier-duty cooling, for instance, at maximum power ratings.

Performance under different loads

Both chips provide stable performance under varying load conditions, although TPA3255 demonstrates greater versatility than its counterpart, TPA3116. The TPA3116 gives solid performance when hooked up to a 4 to 8-ohm speaker, which is the required range for various consumer applications of audio. The TPA3255, however, accepts a range of impedances from 2 to 8 Ohms and is, therefore, more versatile and adaptable to different speaker configurations or professional setups.

TPA3116 vs TPA3255 Audio Quality Analysis

Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)

Total Harmonic Distortion is one of the most vital indicators for distinguishing the audio quality in TPA3116, TPA3255, and TPA3255 amplifiers. Usually rated around 0.1% THD at a 1W output, the TPA3116 cannot command THD as low as the TPA3255's 0.03% THD at the same power output. While there is a minor difference at low output levels, the gap increases when put under stress, and the TPA3255 performs better.

Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

The signal-to-noise ratio is yet another distinguishing factor between these chips. The TPA3116 has an SNR of about 98dB, which is decent for the class. However, the TPA3255 leads the pack with a total of 105dB SNR, which results in lower background noise with more precise reproduction of audio signals.

Frequency response

Both chips have good frequency responses but are supported by the TPA3255, a flatter response across the audible frequency range. The TPA3116 has a range of 20Hz to 20kHz with a ±1dB deviation, and the TPA3255 maintains close with a ±0.5dB deviation across the same ranges; this translates to a more accurate reproduction through sound.

Dynamic range

TPA3255 excites with respect to this capability of dynamic range. The TPA3255 realizes a vast dynamic range above 100dB and is capable of much better handling of tranquil and very loud parts of the music. TPA3116, although not shabby, understates at around 95dB. That may be reflected in the treatment of some complex musical works or from a high-quality audio source.

TPA3116 vs TPA3255 Design and Integration

Package size and type

The TPA3116 and the TPA3255 are the most different products when it comes to their package size and type, and therefore, they inherently have an impact when it comes to the integration of audio systems. The TPA3116 comes in a small SSOP-24 package with dimensions of about 8.65mm x 3.9mm. Its small footprint ensures its suitability for designs with space constraints. On the other hand, the bigger TPA3255 comes in a TSSOP-28 package with dimensions around 9.7mm x 6.4mm. It's large, but it also offers better thermal performance along with easier hand soldering for prototyping.

PCB layout considerations

Several aspects must be kept in mind when a PCB is designed for these types of amplifiers. Because of its small package size, the TPA3116 requires specific, careful PCB layout techniques and consideration for thermal management and signal integrity. The larger package of the TPA3255 enables easier routing and better heat sinking. Both devices require attention to power supply decoupling and ground plane design to mitigate noise and allow for optimal performance.

Ease of implementation

Now that we've touched on the physical let's look at the practicality. The TPA3116, because of its more straightforward pin configuration, is easier to implement in such straightforward audio projects. Due to its small size, this will also likely fit into portable device types. While the TPA3255 requires more real estate on the PCB, it brings with it added features to simplify the design, thereby removing the need for external components in more complex audio systems.

TPA3116 vs TPA3255 Specific Use Cases

Home audio systems

As far as home music systems go, both the TPA3116 and TPA3255, and TPA3255 can claim some advantages. For the TPA3116, this amplifier should be matched with compact bookshelf speakers or soundbars and precise reproduction within small spaces. It's efficient enough on its footing, making it ideal for all energy-conscious homeowners. The TPA3255, thanks to its higher power output, will be better suited for larger living spaces or home theatre systems that require a punchier bass and dynamic range to give all the audiophiles their satisfaction.

Portable devices

For portable devices, the TPA3116 is the better option. Its power efficiency and compact size also make it ideal for use in battery-powered speakers and music players. The TPA3255 is too powerful for most applications and may drain batteries even faster than the previous one.

Automotive applications

In automotive audio, the two chips find their footing. The TPA3116 simplifies essential car audio systems and can even be used for aftermarket upgrades in smaller vehicles. The TPA3255 may shine brighter in high-end car audio installations, providing the power needed for more prominent speakers and subwoofers in larger SUVs and luxury automobiles.

Professional audio equipment

Professional audio equipment will require either extra punch or higher audio fidelity than the TPA3255 can provide. It works well in stage monitor systems, small PA systems for places like clubs, and studio reference monitors. The TPA3116, although somewhat limited, may still be an option for simpler professional setups, such as sound systems for conference rooms.

IoT and smart devices

In the realm of IoT and smart devices, the TPA3116 becomes the preferred option due to its lower power consumption and size. It should go into smart speakers, voice-based devices, and other smart home products where energy efficiency and small sizes are more prominent. The extra power of the TPA3255 may not be necessary for most IoT applications.

Related Articles

What are Audio Transformers for?

LM386 Audio Amplifier Circuit: Features, Applications and Datasheet

PCM5242 vs ESS: Comparing Audio Performance and Features

Car Audio Battery: All You Need to Know

What is an Audio Capacitor and Why Does it Matter?